Bank Rate Up to 4%, Pound Flat at $1.347 (BoE Decision, 5 November 2026): Why the First Hike Since 2023 Didn't Lift Sterling — and What Decides December
The BoE hiked 8–1 to 4% on 5 November, but more than 99% was priced and the pound sat flat near $1.347. The real signal is the split over December.
Bank Rate Up to 4%, Pound Flat at $1.347 (BoE Decision, 5 November 2026): Why the First Hike Since 2023 Didn't Lift Sterling — and What Decides December
The Bank of England raised Bank Rate from 3.75% to 4% on 5 November 2026 by a vote of 8–1, its first increase since August 2023. The pound barely moved, at about $1.347, because markets had put the odds of a hike above 99% and sterling had already risen for six sessions, taking the Bank's trade-weighted index to its highest close since the day of the 2016 referendum. What will move the pound from here is the split inside the committee over whether this was a one-off or the first of several.
Searches for "why didn't the pound go up" spike after nearly every widely expected rate decision. The answer is the same each time, but this meeting shows it unusually clearly. Below: what the Bank decided, why a hike can leave a currency flat, what the minutes show about December, and why the oil price the forecasts assume has already been overtaken.
- Bank Rate rose 25bp to 4% by 8–1. Catherine Mann voted for 50bp. It is the first rise since August 2023.
- More than 99% of it was priced (LSEG, via CNBC), so the decision left the expected rate path, and the pound, almost unchanged.
- The rally came first. The Bank's trade-weighted sterling index closed at 86.54 on 4 November, the highest since 23 June 2016. Most of that gain was against the euro, not the dollar.
- The committee is split on what comes next. Taylor called it insurance, not "the start of a hiking cycle". Greene said more hikes "will likely be required". Markets gave December about a one-in-four chance.
- The forecasts assume $108 Brent. That was the 15-day average to 27 October. Oil has fallen since, and that matters for the 5% inflation peak.
- Compare the rate and commodity factors for GBP against the other seven majors on the live meter.
What the Bank decided
The November Monetary Policy Summary records the decision as a 0.25 percentage point increase to 4%. Eight members voted for it: Andrew Bailey, Sarah Breeden, Swati Dhingra, Megan Greene, Clare Lombardelli, Huw Pill, Dave Ramsden and Alan Taylor. Catherine Mann preferred 0.5 points, to 4.25%. CNBC reported that Mann described the larger move as "good policy" on risk-management and credibility grounds.
The Bank's case rests on energy. CPI inflation was 3.5% in September, pushed up by motor fuel. The Bank now projects about 4½% in the first quarter of 2027 and about 5% in the second, before it falls back as the energy effects drop out. The Summary describes the conflict in the Middle East as "now in its ninth month". It says a credible, sustained de-escalation could lower energy prices, while continued conflict or damage to refining capacity could keep them above what futures imply.
Bailey's own conditional is the key line. In CNBC's report, he said that without "real progress towards settling the conflict in the Middle East... risks to energy prices, and so to inflation, are to the upside." This ties the path of UK rates directly to the path of the oil and gas price.
Why a hike can leave the pound flat
A currency is priced on the interest rate the market expects over the next year or two, not on the rate set on a particular Thursday. By the morning of 5 November, the move to 4% was already built into short-sterling futures, gilt yields and the forward exchange rate. When the Bank delivered exactly that, the expected path hardly changed, so the pound hardly moved either. Reports citing Reuters had sterling at $1.3473 after the decision, up about 0.01%.
The rally happened before the decision. The Bank's own exchange-rate series show where it came from:
| Measure (Bank of England daily series) | 2 Jan 2026 | 23 Oct 2026 | 4 Nov 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling effective exchange rate index | 84.83 | 86.12 | 86.54 |
| GBP/USD | 1.3497 | 1.3387 | 1.3471 |
| GBP/EUR (euros per pound) | 1.1486 | 1.1947 | 1.1991 |
Source: Bank of England statistical database, series XUDLBK67, XUDLUSS and XUDLERS.
Two points stand out. First, the 4 November close of 86.54 is the highest since 23 June 2016, the day of the EU referendum, when the index stood at 87.92 before falling to 81.96 the next day. Second, against the dollar the pound is roughly where it began the year. The gain in the broad index is almost entirely against the euro, where the pound has risen about 4.4% since January. So the "sterling at a post-referendum high" headline is mainly about the euro, and that reflects the rate path in the UK relative to the euro area, not a broad rush into the pound.
The split that will move the pound: insurance or the first of several
The headline was 8–1, but the individual statements in the minutes show a committee that is far from agreed on what comes next. Each member's view on the next move is now the variable that matters for the pound.
| Member | Stated view in the November minutes | Implication for the path |
|---|---|---|
| Catherine Mann | Voted for 50bp, to 4.25% | Most hawkish; wanted more now |
| Megan Greene | "Additional hikes will likely be required going forward" | December or February live |
| Clare Lombardelli | Likely case for a further near-term rise absent evidence of weaker inflation | Conditional on data |
| Andrew Bailey | Can "see the argument for a further increase" absent news that softens inflation risks | Conditional on energy and data |
| Alan Taylor | "Not the start of a hiking cycle"; an insurance hike | One and done |
Source: Bank of England November 2026 Monetary Policy Summary and Minutes; Bailey quote via CNBC.
Markets sit between these views. Before the decision, traders priced roughly a one-in-four chance of another hike in December, CNBC reported, citing LSEG. The Bank's Market Participants Survey shows a median expectation of 4% after this meeting and 4.25% by February, a path the Bank says remains below the UK short-term interest rate curve. In other words, the curve was already more hawkish than the economists surveyed.
The committee's formal guidance leaves both readings open. "Monetary policy is not on a pre-set path," it says, and the Bank "will adjust Bank Rate as necessary to ensure CPI inflation returns to the 2% target in the medium term." That wording commits to nothing, which means the next inflation and labour market releases before 17 December will carry more weight than usual. For how the last CPI release set up this meeting, see our September UK CPI preview.
The $108 problem: the forecasts assume an oil price that has already moved
The Bank's projections use energy futures from the 15 working days to 27 October. Over that window Brent futures averaged $108 a barrel and UK front-month gas averaged 216p a therm. Those levels were 38% and 81% above the July assumptions, and 5% and 27% above the Bank's own July adverse scenario for the fourth quarter.
Oil has fallen since then. Brent dropped 8.7% to $94.62 on 4 November, as we covered in our post on the midterm-day oil drop. That is well below the price behind the 5% inflation peak. Mechanically, if energy futures stay near current levels, the next set of projections would start from a lower energy path. That would weaken the case Greene and Bailey set out, and it would strengthen Taylor's insurance reading. The reverse also applies. The Bank names "damage to refining capacity" and continued conflict as the upside risks, and a renewed jump in crude would revive the December case quickly.
So for the pound, the oil price has become an input to the UK rate path, which is unusual. In most episodes, higher oil weighs on sterling, because the UK is a net energy importer and the shock squeezes real incomes. Here, as long as the Bank responds to energy-driven inflation with tighter policy, higher energy prices raise the expected rate path, and that partly offsets the terms-of-trade hit.
How the decision reaches GBP through the five factors
Interest rates. At 4%, Bank Rate now equals the top of the Federal Reserve's 3.75–4.00% range. The Fed held on 28 October, with two dissents in favour of a hike, as set out in our Fed October preview. For GBP/USD, what matters is whether the Bank or the Fed moves next. US data such as today's October payrolls report shape the Fed side of that comparison.
Growth. The Bank says activity has been stronger than expected but is likely to fall back somewhat, and that labour market slack is levelling off. Higher rates are reaching households faster through mortgages. Two-year benchmark mortgage rates have risen by nearly 50 basis points since early September. If growth slows sharply, that becomes the main argument against a second hike.
Commodities. As set out above, energy is the main reason for the hike, and the oil and gas prices are now the main swing factor for the path.
Risk sentiment. Gilt yields were already rising before the announcement. CNBC reported the 10-year at 5.1546% and the 2-year at 4.782% on the day, both slightly higher. Long yields above 5% keep the UK's fiscal position in view. A disorderly move in long gilts is one of the few things that could drive the pound in a different direction from the rate path.
Positioning. Six straight sessions of gains and a post-referendum high on the trade-weighted index mean many traders were already positioned for a hawkish Bank before the decision. With that much already priced, a stronger move in the pound from here would need a hawkish surprise, such as a December hike becoming the base case.
What to watch before 17 December
- Energy futures. The next forecasts will use a new window of oil and gas prices. Brent staying near $95 rather than $108 would lower the projected inflation peak.
- October CPI and pay data. Members who left the door open, Bailey and Lombardelli, tied their view to evidence on inflation. A firm services print would support a further increase.
- December pricing. It went into the meeting at about one in four. Watch whether it moves toward one in two.
- Speeches by Taylor and Greene. They are at opposite ends of the committee, and their public remarks will show where the middle is moving.
For a broader look at what drives sterling, see what moves the British pound. For the euro and dollar sides of the main crosses, see the EUR and USD pages. For how we build these notes, see about pip theory.
Educational macro context only — not investment advice.

